The RAC Report  | HCPro

In this issue - December 02, 2010

  1. Claim closed: How the demonstration can teach us about RAC-withdrawn reviews

  2. RAC talk: A few minutes with Elizabeth Lamkin

  3. From the field: Recoupment before receipt of demand letters

  4. CMS releases additional documentation request limits for providers

  5. Recent RAC activity

  6. Revenue Cycle Institute issues free monthly tool

Revenue Cycle Institute  | 

View Web Version

 |  Archives  |  Send to a Colleague  |  Subscribe for FREE  | 

Please add our address the_rac_report@list.hcpro.com to your e-mail address book to ensure you receive your eNewsletter issues.


The RAC Report
December 02, 2010
Send to a colleague Send to a colleague
Subscribe for FREE Subscribe for FREE

WELCOME TO THE RAC REPORT

Welcome to The RAC Report, brought to you by HCPro?s Revenue Cycle Institute. Our new bi-weekly e-newsletter is your authoritative source for news, tips, and training for the Medicare?s Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) program. The RAC nationwide rollout begins no later than January 1, 2010, and we will prepare you to be "RAC ready" by offering best practices to avoid RAC recoupments. Click here to learn more about The Revenue Cycle Institute.



Claim closed: How the demonstration can teach us about RAC-withdrawn reviews

Nothing is ever easy for providers in the ever-fluctuating realm of RACs, and the latest spell of operational hiccups heard nationwide is no exception.

No hospital necessarily wants to receive an additional documentation request (ADR) from the RAC, yet when it arrives, it’s essentially not surprising. But when a provider receives a follow-up letter from that RAC informing the facility that the claim is closed and the audit has been rescinded, it may throw that hospital for a loop, according to a revenue integrity auditor from a hospital in Region A (DCS).

“We recently received an automated letter notifying us that Medicare made an overpayment related to a CCI edit with an amount and brief description of the claim associated with the overpayment,” she says. “When I called [the RAC]  to question the letter, a customer service representative told me that they’d rescinded the audit because it was ‘outside their audit scope.’ ”

She continued, “I had to ask for a rescind letter to be sent to me stating this information. We are monitoring the account to assure that money isn’t recouped by NGS on day 41, and this has prompted us to do an internal investigation related to this information.”

Continue reading

Back to top


RAC talk: A few minutes with Elizabeth Lamkin

Name: Elizabeth Lamkin

Title: President

Company: Dalzell Consulting Group, Inc. Hilton Head, SC

Quick-hit RAC background: Elizabeth has 20 years of executive experience including the position of CEO of multi-hospital systems. Most recently she served as president of Hilton Head Regional Healthcare where she was part of the South Carolina RAC demonstration project. Elizabeth successfully navigated the RAC process and implemented a system to ensure appropriate billing compliance and win RAC appeals. Elizabeth is currently president of Dalzell Consulting Group, Inc. specializing in systems improvement to improve margins.

What are some (or just one) of the most common errors you’ve seen hospitals make when it comes to the RAC process? The most common error I have seen hospitals make is poor documentation of medical necessity and continued stay. The by-product of poor or no documentation is inaccurate coding and the inability to appeal RAC findings. Another error hospitals often make is having an out-of-date chargemaster. This can lead to patterns of incorrect billing for such things as dose vs. unit billed. Physicians are also at risk in this area.

Back to top


From the field: Recoupment before receipt of demand letters

The Revenue Cycle Institute recently had a brief conversation with Karen Sagen, managed care leader at Bellin Health Systems in Green Bay, WI, on a recent problem that has been confounding a number of providers nationwide.

Question: There has been talk out there about a confusion issue involving RACs. Apparently some providers have been seeing recoupment before the receipt of demand letters. Can you comment on this?

Answer: We have seen a lot of this and it’s definitely causing some confusion. What is actually happening is that the Medicare Explanation of Benefits (EOMB) shows the N432 code (a RAC denial code that appears on the remittance advice, which is a notice of payments and adjustments sent to providers, billers and suppliers.) and if you look at that entry, it looks as though money has been recouped. However, what is actually happening is that the N432 is attached to the claim at the time the demand letter is produced, which in turn activates the N432 on the EOMB.

Continue reading

Back to top


CMS releases additional documentation request limits for providers

On November 10, CMS-in response to feedback from the RACs, providers/suppliers and their associations-has modified the additional documentation request limits for the RAC program.

View the new ADR limits for providers here:

http://www.cms.gov/RAC/Downloads/ADRpr.pdf

Back to top


Recent RAC activity

CGI adds new RAC issue in two separate categories

CGI, the RAC for Region B, added two new RAC issues -- one for outpatient claims and one for professional claims --to its CMS-approved list for providers in all Region B states.

View the new issues here.

Connolly adds 37 new RAC issues across two categories

Connolly Healthcare, the RAC for Region C, added 37 new issues —30 for DRG validation claims and 7 for medical necessity claims —to its CMS-approved list this week for providers in all Region C states.

View the new issues here.

HealthDataInsights adds new RAC issue for Part A inpatient claims

HealthDataInsights, the RAC for Region D, added a new RAC issue for Part A claims review to its CMS-approved list this week for providers in all Region D states.

View the new issue here.

Back to top


Revenue Cycle Institute issues free monthly tool

Each month the Revenue Cycle Institute publishes a free sample tool or form for readers. We hope you find this month’s tool—a checklist to follow for using condition code 44—helpful when it comes to billing an outpatient claim with condition code 44.

Editor’s note: Access the free tool by clicking here. This checklist was submitted by Deborah Hale, CCS, CCDS, president and CEO of Administrative Consultant Service, LLC, in Shawnee, OK. Additional tools can be accessed by clicking here.

Back to top



RAC Report Advisory Board
Nancy J. Beckley, MS, MBA, CHC
Certified Healthcare Compliance
Bloomingdale Consulting Group
  Yvonne Focke, RN, BSN, MBA
Director, Revenue Cycle & Integrated Care Services
St. Elizabeth Healthcare
Deborah K. Hale, CCS
President/CEO
Administrative Consultant Service, LLC
  Nancy Hirschl, BS, CCS
President
Hirschl and Associates
Kimberly Anderwood Hoy, JD, CPC
Director of Medicare and Compliance
HCPro, Inc.
  Elizabeth Lamkin
President
Dalzell Consulting Group, Inc.
Stacey Levitt, RN, MSN, CPC
Director, Patient Care Management
Lenox Hill Hospital (New York City, NY)
  William Malm, ND
Healthcare Consultant
Craneware PLC
w.malm@craneware.com
Tanja Twist, MBA/HCM
Senior Director of Operations
Adreima
tanja.twist@gmail.com
  Joseph Zebrowitz, MD
Executive vice president
Executive Health Resources



CONTACT US

James Carroll
Associate Editor
The RAC Report
jcarroll@hcpro.com


Volume 3 Issue 22
ISSN# 1947-8925

HCPro, Inc.

75 Sylvan Street, Suite A-101
Danvers, MA 01923
800/650-6787

http://www.hcpro.com


SPONSORSHIP/ADVERTISING OPPORTUNITIES

HCPro provides B2B marketers unparalleled access to a highly qualified and engaged audience. For advertising opportunities in this or other HCPro email newsletters, please contact Paul Nash at info@hcpro.com or call 877-233-8828.

$subst('list.descshort') © 2010 HCPro, Inc. You have permission to forward $subst('list.descshort'), in its entirety only, to your colleagues, provided this copyright notice remains part of your transmission. To subscribe to $subst('list.descshort'), please send an email to: owner-$subst('List.Name')@hcpro.com and type "subscribe (your e-mail address)" in the body. All other rights reserved. None of this material may be reprinted without the expressed written permission of HCPro, Inc.

DISCLAIMER
Advice given is general, and readers should consult professional counsel for specific legal, ethical, or clinical questions. Users of this service should consult attorneys who are familiar with federal and state health laws.

HCPro, Inc. is not affiliated in any way with The Joint Commission, which owns the JCAHO and Joint Commission trademarks, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, which owns the ACGME trademark, or the Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care (AAAHC).

SPONSORSHIP/ADVERTISING OPPORTUNITIES
HCPro provides B2B marketers unparalleled access to a highly qualified and engaged audience. For advertising opportunities in this or other HCPro email newsletters, please contact Paul Nash at info@hcpro.com or call 877-233-8828.

HCPRO'S SERVICES
If you would like further information about any of HCPro's products, including books, seminars, videos, consulting services, or newsletters please visit www.hcmarketplace.com

YOUR SUBSCRIPTION
You are receiving this message as a subscriber to $subst('list.descshort'). If you would like to unsubscribe, just click here and follow the directions on your screen. If you do not have web access, please forward this email to: owner-$subst('List.Name')@hcpro.com and type "Remove $subst('Recip.EmailAddr')" in the body.



Copyright 2010 HCPro, Inc., 75 Sylvan Street, Suite A-101 Danvers, MA 01923

%%detect_open%%